Going for an Interview? Don't Do It Virtually

 As if we didn't have enough to worry about, now experts are saying that job candidates who interview virtually are less likely to get the job.

Thanks so much.  In a time when face-to-face interaction is discouraged, this is very, well, discouraging.

"New research provides some of the first solid evidence that people who watch a virtual job interview rate the candidate substantially lower than those who watch the same interview in person," newswise.com reports.

According to CNBC, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused as many as 8 out of 10 recruiters to turn to videoconferencing to screen and interview job candidates. This conveys a shift in hiring practices that may continue long after the pandemic’s impact wears off.


"With this trend, employers and job applicants may wonder how interviews conducted through Zoom, or other video-mediated communication (VMC) platforms, hold up when compared to face-to-face sessions," newswise quotes Dr. Denise Baker, who worked on the project with Dr. Devin Burns and Dr. Clair Kueny, all assistant professors of psychological science at Missouri S&T.  

To try to prove this, researchers created an experiment using a three-person interview paradigm. One member of the hiring committee asked the candidate questions in person, one member observed the interview in person without asking questions, and one member observed the interview through a video-mediated platform without asking questions, according to newswise.com.

"The researchers analyzed 21 job interviews involving 84 participants. They measured the participants’ observations in three primary areas: impressions of the job applicants, such as likability, competence and hireability; perception of “agency” of the applicants, or the degree to which they were capable of emotion, planning and communication; and how much attention the participants paid to the applicants," newswise explains.

The results showed large differences, with video observers rating the applicant substantially worse across all measures. Differences could even be seen in the adjectives participants used to describe the applicant. Face-to-face passive participants chose words like “experienced” and “intelligent,” to describe the applicant, while VMC passive participants used “unprepared” and “unenthusiastic.”

Wow.  So how do you compete in this environment?  

For students and others who are virtually interviewing for jobs, the researchers suggest that applicants make an effort to address all online observers participating the interviews to make more of a real-life connection with them and gain their attention.

“We’re not saying that Zoom interviews are bad,” says Burns. “What we’re saying is that you can’t fairly compare them with face-to-face sessions, and employers need to keep things standardized.”


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Grieving? Go Shopping, But Not for the Products, for the Actual, Physical Store

I've known it about myself for some time.  When in crisis reach for food or go shopping.  Now a new study says that people turn to consuming to combat problems, feelings and grief. But did you know that it's the commercial settings themselves that people are turning to? Whi le this may not be a surprise to you (maybe you do it, too), but p eople are increasingly turning to commercial settings as outlets for their emotions, confronting problems, grief and feelings , says newswise.com. It is well understood that consumers seek out leisure activities and vacations in order to escape from daily life and real-world problems, the web site reports. "But a new study by Dr Leighanne Higgins, from Lancaster University Management School, and Dr Kathy Hamilton, from the University of Strathclyde, reveals a new consumption trend - the important role of marketplaces in enabling consumers to confront their problems," according to newswise.com. "Whereas previous stu
Read more

Does Your Company's Bottom Line Strategy Hurt Your Performance?

Now this presumably will come as no surprise to anyone, but a new study says that supervisors are driven by the bottom line . Duh. But this may surprise you.  Those who do this do not get their employees' top performance, according to newswsie.com. That's probably not a surprise to anyone, either. Who wants to turn in stellar work when his boss makes him work past a guaranteed end time  (forget your son's soccer game) or criticizes, as I've experienced, everything you do, because your department is not meeting the bottom line? I won't mention the Fortune 500 company. " Supervisors driven by profits could actually be hurting their coveted bottom lines by losing the respect of their employees, who counter by withholding performance, says a new study led by Baylor University," as reported by newswise.com. “Supervisors who focus only on profits to the exclusion of caring about other important outcomes, such as employee well-being or environment
Read more

Don't Practice Before You Speak: Your Memory Deficit May Make You Miss Your Boss' Signal to Stop

How many times have you rehearsed telling your partner bad news?  Honey, I rammed the car through the beauty shop window.  But no one was hurt! Now a new study says that anticipating  performance before a school or work presentation can cause you not to remember what happened before the event. So who cares?  According to newswise.com,  "Performance anticipation could weaken memory because people tend to focus on the details of their upcoming presentation instead of paying attention to information that occurs before their performance," says lead author Noah Forrin, a postdoctoral fellow in Psychology at Waterloo.   "People who experience performance anxiety may be particularly likely to experience this phenomenon." Building on what previous research called the next-in-line effect , Forrin and his co-authors explored how different ways of preparing for a presentation can have an impact on the " pre-performance memory deficit, " the web site reports.
Read more