Can You Tell a Real Voice From a Fake One?

Now here's a question.

Are human brains vulnerable to voice-morphing attacks?

What we're talking about is telling the difference between a human voice, and a morphed (or synthesized) one.  May not seem to matter but what if it's someone pretending to be a lottery official telling you you've won, well, a couple of million?

According to newswise.com, a recent research study led by the University of Alabama at Birmingham’s Department of Computer Science analyzed the differences in neural activities when users are processing different types of voices, including morphed voices.

Huh?

The study showed there may not be any statistically significant differences in the way the human brain processes original legitimate speakers versus synthesized speakers, whereas clear differences are visible when encountering legitimate versus different other human speakers — meaning humans are vulnerable to voice imitation attacks.
“Our study suggests human users may be vulnerable to voice-morphing attacks at a fundamental level, as their brains do not seem to react differently to original versus morphed voices,” says Nitesh Saxena, Ph.D., lead researcher on the study, a professor in UAB’s Department of Computer Science and the director of UAB’s SPIES Lab. “We believe this to be a significant result as it may suggest that people — and their brains — may not be able to tell real and fake voices apart.”
"The researchers examined how the information, present in the neural signals captured by a cutting-edge neuro-imaging modality called functional near-infrared spectroscopy, or fNIRS, can be used to explain users’ susceptibility to voice imitation attacks using synthesized voices," newswise reports.
The study analyzed the differences in neural activities when participants were listening to the original voice and morphed voice of a speaker. The morphed voices were produced using a publicly available voice synthesis tool called CMU Festvox. 
The researchers say they did not see any statistically significant differences in the activations in brain areas that have been reported in previous studies of real versus fake detection, such as real versus fake websites (under phishing attacks) and real versus fake paintings.
The participants in the study showed increased activation in the areas associated with decision-making, working memory, memory recall and trust while deciding on the legitimacy of the voices of speakers compared to the rest trials (where they were not engaged in any task) as the baseline.
"Overall, the results showed the users were certainly putting a considerable effort into making real versus fake decisions as reflected by their brain activity in regions correlated with higher-order cognitive processing," according to newswise. "Although there were neural differences in the way participants’ brains processed original versus different speakers’ voices, no differences were found in the way participants’ brains processed original versus morphed voices."
The behavioral results also suggested users were not doing well in identifying original and morphed voices.
“This would make everyday users highly prone to different forms of scams that may exploit the current and future advancement in voice synthesis,” Saxena notes. “For example, someone can leave you a voice message posing as your mom, and you would not be able to tell. On the positive side, our study also suggests current voice synthesis tools may be ready to serve those who have lost their voices, as the listeners may not be able to perceive the difference between a speaker’s actual voice versus the synthesized voice.”




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Don't Practice Before You Speak: Your Memory Deficit May Make You Miss Your Boss' Signal to Stop

Grieving? Go Shopping, But Not for the Products, for the Actual, Physical Store

Does Your Company's Bottom Line Strategy Hurt Your Performance?