Strong in Your Beliefs? Maybe Weak in Your Accuracy

Blondes are always stupid.  Men aren't as empathetic as women.  Women are worse drivers than men.

Strong convictions.  But are they always correct?  Strong convictions can blind us to information that challenges them, according to a new study reported by newswise.com.

When people are highly confident in a decision, they take in information that confirms their decision, but fail to process information which contradicts it, finds a University College London brain (UCL)imaging study.
The study, published in Nature Communications, helps to explain the neural processes that contribute to the confirmation bias entrenched in most people's thought processes, the website notes.
It's called bias, and "Our study found that our brains become blind to contrary evidence when we are highly confident, which might explain why we don't change our minds in light of new information," newswise quotes lead author, PhD candidate Max Rollwage (Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging at UCL and Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry & Ageing Research). 
For the study, 75 participants had to judge whether a cloud of dots was moving to the left or right side of a computer screen. They then had to give a confidence rating (how certain they were in their response), on a sliding scale from 50% sure to 100% certain.
"After this initial decision, they were shown the moving dots again and asked to make a final decision. The information was made even clearer the second time and could help participants to change their mind if they had initially made a mistake. However, when people were confident in their initial decision, they rarely used this new information to correct their errors," newswise reports.
The researchers also monitored the brain activity of 25 participants as they processed the motion of the dots through a magnetoencephalography (MEG) brain scanner.
Based on this brain activity, the researchers evaluated the degree to which participants processed the newly presented information. When people were not very confident in their initial choice, they integrated the new evidence accurately.
However, when participants were highly confident in their initial choice, their brains were practically blind to information that contradicted their decision but remained sensitive to information that confirmed their choice.
The researchers say that in real-world scenarios where people are more motivated to stand by their beliefs, the effect may be even stronger. 
In a previous, related study, researchers had found that people who hold radical political views - at either end of the political spectrum - aren't as good as moderates at knowing when they're wrong, even about something unrelated to politics.
Because the neural pathways involved in making a perceptual decision are well understood in such simple tasks, this makes it possible for researchers to monitor the relevant brain processes involved. The researchers highlight that an understanding of the mechanism that causes confirmation bias may help in developing interventions that could reduce people's blindness to contradictory information



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Does Your Company's Bottom Line Strategy Hurt Your Performance?

Grieving? Go Shopping, But Not for the Products, for the Actual, Physical Store

Don't Practice Before You Speak: Your Memory Deficit May Make You Miss Your Boss' Signal to Stop